HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Samsung Exynos 1330
23
out 100
VS
36
out 100
Compared 2 processors: HiSilicon Kirin 710A, vs Samsung Exynos 1330. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 86750 | 161056 |
| GPU | 34226 | 63510 |
| Memory | 53515 | 89135 |
| UX | 63929 | 125147 |
| NanoReview Score | 238420 | 438848 |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | 3 fps | 8 fps |
| File Compression | 74 MB/s | 108 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 31.1 pages/s | 58.9 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 48.3 MP/sec | 81 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 1.93 frames/s | 5.89 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 8.4 frames/s | 21.4 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 13.7 frames/s | 40.6 frames/s |
| HDR | 41.7 MP/sec | 66.7 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 1.9 MP/sec | 3.06 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
48 FPS (Medium) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
30 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Fortnite |
26 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Shadowgun Legends |
54 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
60 FPS (Medium) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
58 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
| Device | Huawei Honor 9C (1560x720) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A73 - 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
- 2/2.4 (Cortex-A78) - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 | 2400 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | n/a |
| L2 cache | 512 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G68 MP2 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 1st gen | Valhall 2nd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 949 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 8 | 32 |
| Total shader | 32 | 64 |
| FLOPS | 64 GFLOPS | 121.5 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | No | Yes |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 4.9 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | n/a | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
- UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2340x1080 pixels | 2960x1440 pixels |
| Camera | 1x40 pixels | 1x108 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 12 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 600 MB/s | Up to 2550 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 1280 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 4.2 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | June, 2020 yr | February, 2023 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Low end |
| Codename | n/a | S5E8535 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 1330 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
