HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
24
out 100
VS
14
out 100
Compared 2 processors: HiSilicon Kirin 710F, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 88676 | 50681 |
| GPU | 42169 | 7200 |
| Memory | 55367 | 35968 |
| UX | 65037 | 41040 |
| NanoReview Score | 251249 | 134889 |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 3 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 79.9 MB/s | 60.7 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 41.8 pages/s | 24.4 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 44.5 MP/sec | 38.1 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 1.82 frames/s | 1 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 9.39 frames/s | 7.19 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 13.1 frames/s | 8.57 frames/s |
| HDR | 49.1 MP/sec | 26.6 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2 MP/sec | 1.74 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 - 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
8x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2200 | 1400 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | n/a |
| L2 cache | 512 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | 1 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistor count | 5.5 billion | 1 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G51 MP4 | Adreno 505 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 1st gen | Adreno 500 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 1 |
| Shader Units | 8 | 48 |
| Total shader | 32 | 48 |
| FLOPS | 64 GFLOPS | 43.2 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 11 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | No | Hexagon 536 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory Frequency | 1866 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Bus | 2x32 bit | 1x32 bit |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
eMMC 5.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2340x1080 pixels | 1920x1200 pixels |
| Camera | 1x48 pixels | 1x21 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 30FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | X6 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 12 | LTE Cat. 4 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 600 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 75 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 4 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 4.2 | 4.1 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS |
Other
| Announced | January, 2019 yr | September, 2015 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Low end |
| Codename | n/a | MSM8937 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider HiSilicon Kirin 710F the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
