HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs MediaTek Helio G200

Compared 2 processors: HiSilicon Kirin 8000, vs MediaTek Helio G200. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs HiSilicon Kirin 8000 and MediaTek Helio G200
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
574704
MediaTek Helio G200
444826
CPU178879136988
GPU11810977982
Memory128205118244
UX149511111612
NanoReview Score574704444826
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
999
MediaTek Helio G200
740
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
2948
MediaTek Helio G200
2080
File Compression137.2 MB/sn/a
HTML5 Browser70.9 pages/sn/a
PDF Rendering108.9 MP/secn/a
Background Blur10.3 frames/sn/a
Photo Processing26.3 frames/sn/a
Image Detection55.8 frames/sn/a
HDR91.7 MP/secn/a
Ray Tracing4.05 MP/secn/a

Processor

Architecture - 1x 2.4 GHz – 1xA77 H
- 3x 2.19 GHz – 1xA77 L
- 4x 1.84 GHz – A55
- 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
- 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Process SMIC TSMC
Cores count 8 8
Frequency 2400 2200
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process tech. 7 nm 6 nm

Graphics

GPU specifications including architecture, frequency, compute units, and support for graphics APIs (Vulkan, OpenCL, DirectX).
GPU Model Mali-G610 MP4 Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Valhall 3rd gen Valhall 1st gen
GPU Frequency 864 MHz 1100 MHz
Execution Units 4 2
Shader Units 64 32
Total shader 256 64
FLOPS 442.3 GFLOPS 140.8 GFLOPS
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenCL 2.0 2.0
DirectX n/a 12

AI Acceleration

Specifications of the neural processor (NPU / DSP) responsible for machine learning and AI acceleration tasks.
Artificial Intelligence Yes Yes

Memory

RAM
Memory Type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x16 bit 2x16 bit
Bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 17.1 Gbit/s
Max RAM 12 GB 12 GB

Multimedia

GPU, ISP capabilities, display and camera support, as well as audio and video codec compatibility.
Memory Type - UFS 2.2
- UFS 3.1
UFS 2.2
Max. resolution n/a 2520x1080 pixels
Camera n/a 1x200 pixels
Video recording 4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
Video quality 4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Balong n/a
4G Support n/a LTE Cat. 13
5G Support Yes No
Download speed n/a Up to 650 MB/s
Upload speed n/a Up to 150 MB/s
Wi-Fi version 6 5
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.4
Navigation - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC

Other

Announced October, 2024 yr May, 2025 yr
Class Mid-range Mid-range

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider HiSilicon Kirin 8000 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
4 (80%)
1 (20%)
Total Votes: 5

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below