HiSilicon Kirin 8020 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
67
out 100
VS
24
out 100
Compared 2 processors: HiSilicon Kirin 8020, vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 430571 | 88676 |
| GPU | 551063 | 42169 |
| Memory | 212421 | 55367 |
| UX | 132317 | 65037 |
| NanoReview Score | 1326372 | 251249 |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 3 fps |
| File Compression | 155.7 MB/s | 79.9 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 101.3 pages/s | 41.8 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 117.6 MP/sec | 44.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 11.9 frames/s | 1.82 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 34.7 frames/s | 9.39 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 60.2 frames/s | 13.1 frames/s |
| HDR | 95.4 MP/sec | 49.1 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.78 MP/sec | 2 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 2.285 GHz – - 3x 2.05 GHz – - 4x 1.3 GHz – |
- 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 - 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Process | SMIC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2285 | 2200 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
| L1 cache | n/a | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | n/a | 512 MB |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 1 MB |
| Process tech. | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 5.5 billion |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Maleoon 920 | Mali-G51 MP4 |
| Architecture | Maleoon | Bifrost 1st gen |
| GPU Frequency | 840 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 4 |
| Shader Units | 256 | 8 |
| Total shader | 1024 | 32 |
| FLOPS | 1720.3 GFLOPS | 64 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Da Vinci | No |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4266 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
| Bandwidth | 68.2 Gbit/s | n/a |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 4.0 | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
| Max. resolution | n/a | 2340x1080 pixels |
| Camera | n/a | 1x48 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS, 1K at 120FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 120FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | n/a | LTE Cat. 12 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | n/a | Up to 600 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 7 | 4 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 4.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | May, 2025 yr | January, 2019 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider HiSilicon Kirin 8020 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
