HiSilicon Kirin 8020 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820
67
out 100
VS
37
out 100
Compared 2 processors: HiSilicon Kirin 8020, vs HiSilicon Kirin 820. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 430571 | 146219 |
| GPU | 551063 | 144816 |
| Memory | 212421 | 101046 |
| UX | 132317 | 102432 |
| NanoReview Score | 1326372 | 494513 |
| File Compression | 155.7 MB/s | 99.6 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 101.3 pages/s | 46.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 117.6 MP/sec | 65.3 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 11.9 frames/s | 6.16 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 34.7 frames/s | 17.7 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 60.2 frames/s | 36.4 frames/s |
| HDR | 95.4 MP/sec | 60.3 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.78 MP/sec | 2.86 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 58 FPS (Low) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 41 FPS (Ultra) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 27 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 48 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 57 FPS (Ultra) |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
n/a | 33 FPS (Medium) |
| Device | n/a | Huawei Honor X10 (1080x2400) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 2.285 GHz – - 3x 2.05 GHz – - 4x 1.3 GHz – |
- 1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 - 3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76 - 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | SMIC | n/a |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2285 | 2360 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process tech. | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Maleoon 920 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
| Architecture | Maleoon | Valhall 1st gen |
| GPU Frequency | 840 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 6 |
| Shader Units | 256 | 32 |
| Total shader | 1024 | 192 |
| FLOPS | 1720.3 GFLOPS | 326.4 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Da Vinci | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4266 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 68.2 Gbit/s | 31.78 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 2.1 |
| Max. resolution | n/a | 3360x1440 pixels |
| Camera | n/a | 1x48 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS, 1K at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 120FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | Balong 5000 |
| 4G Support | n/a | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | n/a | Up to 4600 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 7 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
Other
| Announced | May, 2025 yr | March, 2020 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider HiSilicon Kirin 8020 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
