HiSilicon Kirin 8020 vs MediaTek Helio G200

Compared 2 processors: HiSilicon Kirin 8020, vs MediaTek Helio G200. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs HiSilicon Kirin 8020 and MediaTek Helio G200
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
HiSilicon Kirin 8020
1326372
MediaTek Helio G200
444826
CPU430571136988
GPU55106377982
Memory212421118244
UX132317111612
NanoReview Score1326372444826
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
HiSilicon Kirin 8020
1350
MediaTek Helio G200
740
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
HiSilicon Kirin 8020
3570
MediaTek Helio G200
2080
File Compression155.7 MB/sn/a
HTML5 Browser101.3 pages/sn/a
PDF Rendering117.6 MP/secn/a
Background Blur11.9 frames/sn/a
Photo Processing34.7 frames/sn/a
Image Detection60.2 frames/sn/a
HDR95.4 MP/secn/a
Ray Tracing4.78 MP/secn/a

Processor

Architecture - 1x 2.285 GHz –
- 3x 2.05 GHz –
- 4x 1.3 GHz –
- 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
- 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Process SMIC TSMC
Cores count 8 8
Frequency 2285 2200
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
Process tech. 7 nm 6 nm

Graphics

GPU specifications including architecture, frequency, compute units, and support for graphics APIs (Vulkan, OpenCL, DirectX).
GPU Model Maleoon 920 Mali-G57 MP2
Architecture Maleoon Valhall 1st gen
GPU Frequency 840 MHz 1100 MHz
Execution Units 4 2
Shader Units 256 32
Total shader 1024 64
FLOPS 1720.3 GFLOPS 140.8 GFLOPS
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenCL 2.0 2.0
DirectX 12 12

AI Acceleration

Specifications of the neural processor (NPU / DSP) responsible for machine learning and AI acceleration tasks.
Artificial Intelligence Da Vinci Yes

Memory

RAM
Memory Type LPDDR5X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 4266 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 4x16 bit 2x16 bit
Bandwidth 68.2 Gbit/s 17.1 Gbit/s
Max RAM 16 GB 12 GB

Multimedia

GPU, ISP capabilities, display and camera support, as well as audio and video codec compatibility.
Memory Type UFS 4.0 UFS 2.2
Max. resolution n/a 2520x1080 pixels
Camera n/a 1x200 pixels
Video recording 4K at 60FPS, 1K at 120FPS 2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
Video quality 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 120FPS 2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G Support n/a LTE Cat. 13
5G Support Yes No
Download speed n/a Up to 650 MB/s
Upload speed n/a Up to 150 MB/s
Wi-Fi version 7 5
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Navigation - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC

Other

Announced May, 2025 yr May, 2025 yr
Class Mid-range Mid-range

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider HiSilicon Kirin 8020 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below