HiSilicon Kirin 8020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
67
out 100
VS
81
out 100
Compared 2 processors: HiSilicon Kirin 8020, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 430571 | 367514 |
| GPU | 551063 | 596874 |
| Memory | 212421 | 300073 |
| UX | 132317 | 297159 |
| NanoReview Score | 1326372 | 1561620 |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 77 fps |
| File Compression | 155.7 MB/s | 210 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 101.3 pages/s | 153.9 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 117.6 MP/sec | 153.3 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 11.9 frames/s | 17.1 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 34.7 frames/s | 51.9 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 60.2 frames/s | 128.6 frames/s |
| HDR | 95.4 MP/sec | 159.7 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.78 MP/sec | 5.92 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 90 FPS (Ultra) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 60 FPS (Ultra) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 56 FPS (Ultra) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 118 FPS (Ultra) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 120 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 59 FPS (Ultra) |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
n/a | 59 FPS (Ultra) |
| Device | n/a | ZTE Nubia Red Magic 8 Pro (1116x2480) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 2.285 GHz – - 3x 2.05 GHz – - 4x 1.3 GHz – |
- 1/3.2 (Cortex-X3) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A715) - 2/2.8 (Cortex-A710) - 3/2 (Cortex-A510) |
| Process | SMIC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2285 | 3200 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv9-A |
| L2 cache | n/a | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 8 MB |
| Process tech. | 7 nm | 4 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 16 billion |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 8.5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Maleoon 920 | Adreno 740 |
| Architecture | Maleoon | Adreno 700 |
| GPU Frequency | 840 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 3 |
| Shader Units | 256 | 512 |
| Total shader | 1024 | 1536 |
| FLOPS | 1720.3 GFLOPS | 2089 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Da Vinci | Hexagon |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 4266 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 68.2 Gbit/s | 67.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 4.0 | - UFS 3.1 - UFS 4.0 |
| Max. resolution | n/a | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | n/a | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS, 1K at 120FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 120FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | Snapdragon X70 |
| 4G Support | n/a | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | n/a | Up to 10000 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 3500 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 7 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | May, 2025 yr | November, 2022 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Codename | n/a | SM8550-AB |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 6
