HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020
53
out 100
VS
67
out 100
Compared 2 processors: HiSilicon Kirin 9000, vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 242171 | 430571 |
| GPU | 315801 | 551063 |
| Memory | 155272 | 212421 |
| UX | 188275 | 132317 |
| NanoReview Score | 901517 | 1326372 |
| Stability | 54 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 36 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 146.1 MB/s | 155.7 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 90.8 pages/s | 101.3 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 113.9 MP/sec | 117.6 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 11.8 frames/s | 11.9 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 29.7 frames/s | 34.7 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 71.8 frames/s | 60.2 frames/s |
| HDR | 98.9 MP/sec | 95.4 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.01 MP/sec | 4.78 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
81 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
44 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Fortnite |
29 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
51 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
60 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
58 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
| Device | Huawei Mate 40 Pro (1344x3140) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 - 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 - 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 1x 2.285 GHz – - 3x 2.05 GHz – - 4x 1.3 GHz – |
| Process | TSMC | SMIC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3130 | 2285 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistor count | 15.3 billion | n/a |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G78 MP24 | Maleoon 920 |
| Architecture | Valhall 2nd gen | Maleoon |
| GPU Frequency | 759 MHz | 840 MHz |
| Execution Units | 24 | 4 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 256 |
| Total shader | 768 | 1024 |
| FLOPS | 1165.8 GFLOPS | 1720.3 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | AI accelerator | Da Vinci |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2750 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 44 Gbit/s | 68.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2160 pixels | n/a |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS, 1K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Balong 5000 | n/a |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 4600 MB/s | n/a |
| Upload speed | Up to 2500 MB/s | n/a |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | October, 2020 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider HiSilicon Kirin 8020 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
