HiSilicon Kirin 9000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820
53
out 100
VS
37
out 100
Compared 2 processors: HiSilicon Kirin 9000, vs HiSilicon Kirin 820. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 242171 | 146219 |
| GPU | 315801 | 144816 |
| Memory | 155272 | 101046 |
| UX | 188275 | 102432 |
| NanoReview Score | 901517 | 494513 |
| Stability | 54 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 36 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 146.1 MB/s | 99.6 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 90.8 pages/s | 46.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 113.9 MP/sec | 65.3 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 11.8 frames/s | 6.16 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 29.7 frames/s | 17.7 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 71.8 frames/s | 36.4 frames/s |
| HDR | 98.9 MP/sec | 60.3 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.01 MP/sec | 2.86 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
81 FPS (Ultra) | 58 FPS (Low) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
44 FPS (Ultra) | 41 FPS (Ultra) |
 Fortnite |
29 FPS (Low) | 27 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
51 FPS (Ultra) | 48 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
60 FPS (Ultra) | 57 FPS (Ultra) |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
58 FPS (Ultra) | 33 FPS (Medium) |
| Device | Huawei Mate 40 Pro (1344x3140) | Huawei Honor X10 (1080x2400) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 - 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 - 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 - 3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76 - 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | TSMC | n/a |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3130 | 2360 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistor count | 15.3 billion | n/a |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G78 MP24 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
| Architecture | Valhall 2nd gen | Valhall 1st gen |
| GPU Frequency | 759 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution Units | 24 | 6 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 32 |
| Total shader | 768 | 192 |
| FLOPS | 1165.8 GFLOPS | 326.4 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | AI accelerator | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 44 Gbit/s | 31.78 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2160 pixels | 3360x1440 pixels |
| Camera | n/a | 1x48 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Balong 5000 | Balong 5000 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 4600 MB/s | Up to 4600 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 2500 MB/s | n/a |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
Other
| Announced | October, 2020 yr | March, 2020 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider HiSilicon Kirin 9000 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
