HiSilicon Kirin 9020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
62
out 100
VS
48
out 100
Compared 2 processors: HiSilicon Kirin 9020, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 351356 | 258336 |
| GPU | 288768 | 183669 |
| Memory | 443211 | 138904 |
| UX | 211533 | 176993 |
| NanoReview Score | 1294877 | 757902 |
| File Compression | 203.6 MB/s | 154.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 144.6 pages/s | 81.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 162.6 MP/sec | 109.9 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 16.1 frames/s | 11.7 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 51.8 frames/s | 25 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 91.2 frames/s | 55.8 frames/s |
| HDR | 138.7 MP/sec | 93 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 6.36 MP/sec | 4.14 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 2.5 GHz – TaiShan V121 - 3x 2.15 GHz – TaiShan V120 - 4x 1.6 GHz – Taishan-Little |
- 1x 2.3 GHz – Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720) - 3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720) - 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520) |
| Process | SMIC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2500 | 2300 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv9-A |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | 10 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 7 nm | 4 nm |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Maleoon 920 | Adreno 810 |
| Architecture | Maleoon | Adreno 800 |
| GPU Frequency | 840 MHz | 895 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 256 | 128 |
| Total shader | 1024 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 1720.3 GFLOPS | 458.2 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Da Vinci | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 4266 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 68.2 Gbit/s | 25.6 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 4.0 | - UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2160 pixels | 3360x1600 pixels |
| Camera | n/a | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Balong 6000 | Qualcomm X62 5G |
| 4G Support | n/a | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | n/a | Up to 2900 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 1600 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 7 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | November, 2024 yr | February, 2025 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Codename | n/a | SM6650 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider HiSilicon Kirin 9020 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 2
