HiSilicon Kirin 9020 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
62
out 100
VS
40
out 100
Compared 2 processors: HiSilicon Kirin 9020, vs Samsung Exynos 9825. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 351356 | 162639 |
| GPU | 288768 | 210971 |
| Memory | 443211 | 155095 |
| UX | 211533 | 132258 |
| NanoReview Score | 1294877 | 661017 |
| Stability | n/a | 97 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 20 fps |
| File Compression | 203.6 MB/s | 111.7 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 144.6 pages/s | 68.2 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 162.6 MP/sec | 66.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 16.1 frames/s | 7.44 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 51.8 frames/s | 21 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 91.2 frames/s | 47.6 frames/s |
| HDR | 138.7 MP/sec | 80.8 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 6.36 MP/sec | 2.67 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 2.5 GHz – TaiShan V121 - 3x 2.15 GHz – TaiShan V120 - 4x 1.6 GHz – Taishan-Little |
- 2/2.73 (M4) - 2/2.4 (Cortex-A75) - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | SMIC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2500 | 2730 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 10 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 8.5 billion |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Maleoon 920 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| Architecture | Maleoon | Bifrost 3rd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 840 MHz | 754 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 12 |
| Shader Units | 256 | 24 |
| Total shader | 1024 | 288 |
| FLOPS | 1720.3 GFLOPS | 434.3 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Da Vinci | Yes |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 1.86 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4266 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 68.2 Gbit/s | 33.4 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 4.0 | - UFS 2.1 - UFS 3.0 |
| Max. resolution | 3840x2160 pixels | 3840x2400 pixels |
| Camera | n/a | 1x32 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Balong 6000 | Exynos 5100 |
| 4G Support | n/a | LTE Cat. 20 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | n/a | Up to 2000 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 316 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 7 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | November, 2024 yr | August, 2019 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Flagship |
| Codename | n/a | S5E9825 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider HiSilicon Kirin 9020 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
