MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Samsung Exynos 2100
38
out 100
VS
53
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Dimensity 7025, vs Samsung Exynos 2100. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 155239 | 264571 |
| GPU | 48779 | 297459 |
| Memory | 122767 | 144480 |
| UX | 136016 | 188158 |
| NanoReview Score | 462801 | 894668 |
| Stability | n/a | 66 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 34 fps |
| File Compression | 122.6 MB/s | 157.4 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 64.2 pages/s | 75.1 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 95.3 MP/sec | 105.8 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 7.74 frames/s | 12.7 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 24.3 frames/s | 21.1 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 47.9 frames/s | 70.4 frames/s |
| HDR | 77.1 MP/sec | 112.2 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 3.36 MP/sec | 4.42 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X1 - 3x 2.81 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2500 | 2900 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.4-A |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistor count | 10 billion | n/a |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 8 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G78 MP14 |
| Architecture | PowerVR IMG GPU | Valhall 2nd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 854 MHz |
| Execution Units | 8 | 14 |
| Shader Units | 16 | 32 |
| Total shader | 128 | 448 |
| FLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS | 765.2 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Yes |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 26 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.1 |
UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 2K at 30FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 2K at 30FPS | 8K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | Exynos 5300 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 2770 MB/s | Up to 7350 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 1250 MB/s | Up to 3670 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | April, 2024 yr | December, 2020 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Codename | n/a | S5E9840 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 2100 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
