MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Samsung Exynos 2400
40
out 100
VS
87
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Dimensity 7050, vs Samsung Exynos 2400. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 173485 | 451893 |
| GPU | 115295 | 722765 |
| Memory | 136178 | 300546 |
| UX | 164202 | 290016 |
| NanoReview Score | 589160 | 1765220 |
| Graphics Test | 13 fps | 83 fps |
| File Compression | 122.4 MB/s | 271 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 60.8 pages/s | 207.8 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 90.6 MP/sec | 220.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 6.5 frames/s | 21.8 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 21.5 frames/s | 65.3 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 45.7 frames/s | 159.2 frames/s |
| HDR | 70.8 MP/sec | 211.5 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 3.32 MP/sec | 7.4 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4 - 2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720 - 3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720 - 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 10 |
| Frequency | 2600 | 3210 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 8 MB |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 4 W | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G68 MP4 | Samsung Xclipse 940 |
| Architecture | Valhall 2nd gen | Magellan (RDNA 3) |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 1095 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 6 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 128 |
| Total shader | 128 | 768 |
| FLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS | 3406.8 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek APU 550 | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 4200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 68.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 2.1 - UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.0 - UFS 3.1 |
- UFS 3.1 - UFS 4.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 3840x2400 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x320 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 30FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 30FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | Exynos 5300 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 2770 MB/s | Up to 9640 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 1250 MB/s | Up to 2550 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | May, 2023 yr | January, 2024 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Codename | MT6877, MT6877V/TTZA | S5E9945 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 2400 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
