MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs Apple M1 (iPad)
46
out 100
VS
95
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, vs Apple M1 (iPad). Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 242812 | 479517 |
| GPU | 180896 | 777678 |
| Memory | 155997 | 194372 |
| UX | 170927 | 334430 |
| NanoReview Score | 750632 | 1795997 |
| Stability | n/a | 73 % |
| Graphics Test | 25 fps | 102 fps |
| File Compression | 120.2 MB/s | 326.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 83.7 pages/s | 176 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 94.9 MP/sec | 224.2 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 7.8 frames/s | 31.9 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 25.1 frames/s | 70 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 59.7 frames/s | 192 frames/s |
| HDR | 81.9 MP/sec | 283 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 3.26 MP/sec | 9.65 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
- 4x 2.1 GHz – Firestorm - 4x 3.2 GHz – Icestorm |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2800 | 3200 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.5-A |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 12 MB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 5 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 16 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | 14 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G610 MP4 | Apple M1 GPU |
| Architecture | Valhall 3rd gen | Apple GPU |
| GPU Frequency | 1130 MHz | 1278 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 8 |
| Shader Units | 64 | 128 |
| Total shader | 256 | 1024 |
| FLOPS | 578.6 GFLOPS | 2617 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | n/a |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek APU 650 | Apple Neural Engine |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 11 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 25.6 Gbit/s | 68.25 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 3.1 | NVMe |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 2732x2048 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | n/a |
| Video recording | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 - Motion JPEG |
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 21 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 4700 MB/s | Up to 7500 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 2500 MB/s | Up to 2500 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Galileo - QZSS |
Other
| Announced | September, 2023 yr | November, 2020 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Codename | n/a | APL1102 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Apple M1 (iPad) the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
