MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra vs Samsung Exynos 1580
46
out 100
VS
56
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Ultra, vs Samsung Exynos 1580. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 242812 | 289519 |
| GPU | 180896 | 265302 |
| Memory | 155997 | 156294 |
| UX | 170927 | 195882 |
| NanoReview Score | 750632 | 906997 |
| Graphics Test | 25 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 120.2 MB/s | 184.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 83.7 pages/s | 112.2 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 94.9 MP/sec | 138.4 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 7.8 frames/s | 15 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 25.1 frames/s | 35 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 59.7 frames/s | 68 frames/s |
| HDR | 81.9 MP/sec | 104.8 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 3.26 MP/sec | 4.96 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
- 1x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720 - 3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720 - 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2800 | 2900 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | n/a |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 4 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G610 MP4 | Samsung Xclipse 540 |
| Architecture | Valhall 3rd gen | Magellan (RDNA 3) |
| GPU Frequency | 1130 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 64 | 128 |
| Total shader | 256 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 578.6 GFLOPS | 1331.2 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek APU 650 | Yes |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 14.7 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 25.6 Gbit/s | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 2960x1440 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 21 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 4700 MB/s | Up to 5100 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 2500 MB/s | Up to 1280 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
Other
| Announced | September, 2023 yr | October, 2024 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | n/a | S5E8855 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 1580 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
