MediaTek Dimensity 8050 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400
48
out 100
VS
82
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8050, vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 213398 | 350248 |
| GPU | 221299 | 607362 |
| Memory | 155421 | 363103 |
| UX | 175335 | 312884 |
| NanoReview Score | 765453 | 1633597 |
| Stability | 96 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 27 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 163.8 MB/s | 262.5 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 96.3 pages/s | 190.4 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 128.8 MP/sec | 213.4 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 9.86 frames/s | 20.7 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 33.4 frames/s | 53.3 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 69.7 frames/s | 113.5 frames/s |
| HDR | 117.2 MP/sec | 168.7 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.59 MP/sec | 6.99 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-A725 - 3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A725 - 4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A725 |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3000 | 3250 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| L2 cache | n/a | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 6 MB |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 7 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G77 MP9 | Mali-G720 MP7 |
| Architecture | Valhall 1st gen | Valhall 5th gen |
| GPU Frequency | 886 MHz | 1300 MHz |
| Execution Units | 9 | 7 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 128 |
| Total shader | 288 | 896 |
| FLOPS | 510.3 GFLOPS | 2329.6 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.2 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek APU 570 | MediaTek NPU 880 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 34.1 Gbit/s | 68.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 2960x1440 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x320 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 21 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 4700 MB/s | Up to 5170 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 2500 MB/s | n/a |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 6.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | May, 2023 yr | December, 2024 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | MT6893, MT6893Z_T/CZA | MT6899, MT6899Z |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider MediaTek Dimensity 8400 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 2
