MediaTek Dimensity 8050 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
48
out 100
VS
29
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8050, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 213398 | 97035 |
| GPU | 221299 | 116400 |
| Memory | 155421 | 87397 |
| UX | 175335 | 67775 |
| NanoReview Score | 765453 | 368607 |
| Stability | 96 % | 95 % |
| Graphics Test | 27 fps | 6 fps |
| File Compression | 163.8 MB/s | 89.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 96.3 pages/s | 51.5 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 128.8 MP/sec | 58.8 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 9.86 frames/s | 2.83 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 33.4 frames/s | 12 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 69.7 frames/s | 14.1 frames/s |
| HDR | 117.2 MP/sec | 55.2 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.59 MP/sec | 2.43 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 4/2.45 (Kryo 280 Cortex-A73) - 4/1.9 (Kryo 280 Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3000 | 2450 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| L1 cache | n/a | 128 KB |
| L2 cache | n/a | 2 MB |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 10 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 3 billion |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 9 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G77 MP9 | Adreno 540 |
| Architecture | Valhall 1st gen | Adreno 500 |
| GPU Frequency | 886 MHz | 710 MHz |
| Execution Units | 9 | 4 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 64 |
| Total shader | 288 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 510.3 GFLOPS | 363.5 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 11 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek APU 570 | Hexagon 682 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
| Bandwidth | 34.1 Gbit/s | 29.8 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x32 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | X16 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 21 | LTE Cat. 16 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 4700 MB/s | Up to 1000 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 2500 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS |
Other
| Announced | May, 2023 yr | November, 2016 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Codename | MT6893, MT6893Z_T/CZA | MSM8998 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider MediaTek Dimensity 8050 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
