MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs MediaTek Helio G200
34
out 100
VS
n/a
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Dimensity 810, vs MediaTek Helio G200. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 145931 | 136988 |
| GPU | 65720 | 77982 |
| Memory | 99558 | 118244 |
| UX | 110681 | 111612 |
| NanoReview Score | 421890 | 444826 |
| Graphics Test | 8 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 97.7 MB/s | n/a |
| HTML5 Browser | 50.3 pages/s | n/a |
| PDF Rendering | 63 MP/sec | n/a |
| Background Blur | 5.4 frames/s | n/a |
| Photo Processing | 17.5 frames/s | n/a |
| Image Detection | 37.6 frames/s | n/a |
| HDR | 57.2 MP/sec | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | 2.85 MP/sec | n/a |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
77 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
42 FPS (High) | n/a |
 Fortnite |
26 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Shadowgun Legends |
74 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
56 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
59 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
37 FPS (Low) | n/a |
| Device | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro 5G (1080x2400) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2400 | 2200 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | n/a |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | n/a |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| Architecture | Valhall 1st gen | Valhall 1st gen |
| GPU Frequency | 1068 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 32 |
| Total shader | 64 | 64 |
| FLOPS | 136.7 GFLOPS | 140.8 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek NPU 3.0 | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 17.07 Gbit/s | 17.1 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x64 pixels | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 2K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 2K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 2770 MB/s | Up to 650 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 1250 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | August, 2021 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | MT6833V | n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider MediaTek Dimensity 810 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
