MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs MediaTek MT6737
52
out 100
VS
10
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8100, vs MediaTek MT6737. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 256612 | 16596 |
| GPU | 242461 | 2974 |
| Memory | 174728 | 27828 |
| UX | 181730 | 11691 |
| NanoReview Score | 855531 | 59089 |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 35 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 165.4 MB/s | 39.4 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 110.2 pages/s | 17.9 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 139.8 MP/sec | 17.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 10.3 frames/s | 0.89 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 30 frames/s | 5.03 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 79.5 frames/s | 6.57 frames/s |
| HDR | 116.3 MP/sec | 17.1 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.71 MP/sec | 1.04 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
77 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
60 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Fortnite |
26 FPS (High) | n/a |
 Shadowgun Legends |
74 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
98 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
59 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
57 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
| Device | OnePlus Ace (1080x2412) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4/1.3 (Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 4 |
| Frequency | 2850 | 1300 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 5 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 1 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | 7 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G610 MP6 | Mali-T720 MP2 |
| Architecture | Valhall 3rd gen | Midgard 3rd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 860 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution Units | 6 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 64 | 10 |
| Total shader | 384 | 20 |
| FLOPS | 660.5 GFLOPS | 26 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | n/a |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek APU 580 | No |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR3 |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 640 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 1x32 bit |
| Bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 6.4 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 3 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2960x1440 pixels | 1280x720 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x13 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
H.264 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | MediaTek UltraSave 2.0 | MT6169 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 21 | LTE Cat. 4 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 4700 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 2500 MB/s | Up to 50 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 4 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.3 | 4.1 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
GPS |
Other
| Announced | March, 2022 yr | January, 2016 yr |
| Class | Flagship | Mid-range |
| Codename | MT6895Z/TCZA | MT6737 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider MediaTek Dimensity 8100 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 13
