MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
71
out 100
VS
39
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8300, vs MediaTek Dimensity 920. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 299593 | 169830 |
| GPU | 524768 | 113631 |
| Memory | 327987 | 111717 |
| UX | 254361 | 152861 |
| NanoReview Score | 1406709 | 548039 |
| Stability | 89 % | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | 58 fps | 13 fps |
| File Compression | 178.7 MB/s | 116.7 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 134.1 pages/s | 60.1 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 146.9 MP/sec | 85.8 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 12.5 frames/s | 6.59 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 36 frames/s | 14.9 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 96.5 frames/s | 45.8 frames/s |
| HDR | 133.3 MP/sec | 73.5 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 5.05 MP/sec | 3.29 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 64 FPS (Ultra) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 59 FPS (High) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 27 FPS (Low) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 68 FPS (Medium) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 59 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 53 FPS (Ultra) |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
n/a | 46 FPS (Medium) |
| Device | n/a | Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus (1080x2400) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715 - 3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715 - 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
- 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3350 | 2500 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | 2 MB |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 10 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | 4 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G615 MP6 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
| Architecture | Valhall 4rd gen | Valhall 2nd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 1400 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution Units | 6 | 4 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 32 |
| Total shader | 768 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek APU 780 | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 4266 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 68.2 Gbit/s | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 24 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 4.0 | - UFS 2.1 - UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2960x1440 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x320 pixels | 1x108 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | MediaTek T800 | n/a |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 5170 MB/s | Up to 2770 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 1250 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | November, 2023 yr | August, 2021 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | MT6897 | MT6877T |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider MediaTek Dimensity 8300 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
