MediaTek Dimensity 8300 vs Samsung Exynos 9611
71
out 100
VS
24
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8300, vs Samsung Exynos 9611. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 299593 | 64779 |
| GPU | 524768 | 56523 |
| Memory | 327987 | 58421 |
| UX | 254361 | 80023 |
| NanoReview Score | 1406709 | 259746 |
| Stability | 89 % | 73 % |
| Graphics Test | 58 fps | 4 fps |
| File Compression | 178.7 MB/s | 70.5 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 134.1 pages/s | 37.2 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 146.9 MP/sec | 43 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 12.5 frames/s | 1.5 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 36 frames/s | 8.33 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 96.5 frames/s | 11.9 frames/s |
| HDR | 133.3 MP/sec | 43.6 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 5.05 MP/sec | 1.95 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 31 FPS (High) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 40 FPS (Medium) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 43 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 38 FPS (High) |
| Device | n/a | Samsung Galaxy A51 (1080x2400) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715 - 3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715 - 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
- 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73 - 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3350 | 2300 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8-A |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 10 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 3 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | 8 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G615 MP6 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| Architecture | Valhall 4rd gen | Bifrost 2nd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 1400 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution Units | 6 | 3 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 12 |
| Total shader | 768 | 24 |
| FLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS | 61.2 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek APU 780 | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4266 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 68.2 Gbit/s | 11.9 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 24 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 4.0 | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2960x1440 pixels | 2560x1600 pixels |
| Camera | 1x320 pixels | 1x64 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | MediaTek T800 | Shannon 337 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 12 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 5170 MB/s | Up to 600 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | November, 2023 yr | September, 2019 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | MT6897 | S5E9611 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider MediaTek Dimensity 8300 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
