MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
70
out 100
VS
23
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8350, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 324360 | 89180 |
| GPU | 484687 | 36992 |
| Memory | 265076 | 56965 |
| UX | 279011 | 68869 |
| NanoReview Score | 1353134 | 252006 |
| Stability | n/a | 96 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 2 fps |
| File Compression | 181.9 MB/s | 71.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 136.6 pages/s | 41.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 163 MP/sec | 51.8 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 13 frames/s | 1.89 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 35.2 frames/s | 10.2 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 98.3 frames/s | 13.6 frames/s |
| HDR | 133.4 MP/sec | 46.2 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.81 MP/sec | 1.97 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715 - 3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715 - 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
- 4/2.2 (Kryo 260 Gold Cortex-A73) - 4/1.84 (Kryo 260 Silver Cortex-A53) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3350 | 2200 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8-A |
| L2 cache | n/a | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 1.75 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G615 MP6 | Adreno 512 |
| Architecture | Valhall 4rd gen | Adreno 500 |
| GPU Frequency | 1400 MHz | 647 MHz |
| Execution Units | 6 | 1 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 128 |
| Total shader | 768 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS | 165.6 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 11 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek APU 780 | Hexagon 680 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4266 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 68.2 Gbit/s | 13.9 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 24 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 4.0 | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2960x1440 pixels | 2560x1600 pixels |
| Camera | 1x320 pixels | 1x48 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
Connectivity
| Modem | MediaTek T800 | X12 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 5170 MB/s | Up to 600 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | November, 2024 yr | May, 2017 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | MT6897 MT6897Z_A/ZA MT8792Z/NA | SM6115 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider MediaTek Dimensity 8350 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
