MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
70
out 100
VS
32
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8350, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 324360 | 134363 |
| GPU | 484687 | 60115 |
| Memory | 265076 | 77269 |
| UX | 279011 | 111051 |
| NanoReview Score | 1353134 | 382798 |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 4 fps |
| File Compression | 181.9 MB/s | 94.4 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 136.6 pages/s | 49.3 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 163 MP/sec | 64.1 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 13 frames/s | 5.55 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 35.2 frames/s | 16.9 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 98.3 frames/s | 37.4 frames/s |
| HDR | 133.4 MP/sec | 58.8 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.81 MP/sec | 2.62 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715 - 3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715 - 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
- 2x 2 GHz – Kryo 560 Gold (Cortex-A77) - 6x 1.7 GHz – Kryo 560 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 3350 | 2000 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 8 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G615 MP6 | Adreno 619 |
| Architecture | Valhall 4rd gen | Adreno 600 |
| GPU Frequency | 1400 MHz | 565 MHz |
| Execution Units | 6 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 128 |
| Total shader | 768 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS | 289.3 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek APU 780 | Hexagon 692 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 5 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 4266 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 68.2 Gbit/s | 14.9 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 24 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 4.0 | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 - UFS 3.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2960x1440 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x320 pixels | 1x192 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | MediaTek T800 | Snapdragon X51 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 5170 MB/s | Up to 2500 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 900 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | November, 2024 yr | June, 2020 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | MT6897 MT6897Z_A/ZA MT8792Z/NA | SM6350 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider MediaTek Dimensity 8350 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
