MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs Xiaomi Xring O1
82
out 100
VS
96
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Dimensity 8400, vs Xiaomi Xring O1. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 350248 | 610476 |
| GPU | 607362 | 990126 |
| Memory | 363103 | 533495 |
| UX | 312884 | 367273 |
| NanoReview Score | 1633597 | 2501370 |
| File Compression | 262.5 MB/s | 375.2 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 190.4 pages/s | 279.9 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 213.4 MP/sec | 307.7 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 20.7 frames/s | 37.2 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 53.3 frames/s | 106.3 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 113.5 frames/s | 242.2 frames/s |
| HDR | 168.7 MP/sec | 299.3 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 6.99 MP/sec | 9.25 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-A725 - 3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A725 - 4x 2.1 GHz – Cortex-A725 |
- 2x 3.9 GHz – Cortex-X925 - 4x 3.4 GHz – Cortex-A725 - 2x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A725 - 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A520 |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 10 |
| Frequency | 3250 | 3900 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB | 16 MB |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 3 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 19 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 7 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G720 MP7 | Mali-G925 Immortalis MP16 |
| Architecture | Valhall 5th gen | Valhall 5th gen |
| GPU Frequency | 1300 MHz | 1392 MHz |
| Execution Units | 7 | 16 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 128 |
| Total shader | 896 | 2048 |
| FLOPS | 2329.6 GFLOPS | 5701.6 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 3.2 | 3.0 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek NPU 880 | Yes |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 44 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X | LPDDR5T |
| Memory Frequency | 4266 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 68.2 Gbit/s | 76.8 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 24 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 4.0 | UFS 4.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2960x1440 pixels | n/a |
| Camera | 1x320 pixels | n/a |
| Video recording | 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 60FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | MediaTek T800 |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 5170 MB/s | Up to 7900 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 4200 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 6.0 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
Other
| Announced | December, 2024 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Codename | MT6899, MT6899Z | n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Xiaomi Xring O1 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
