MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs MediaTek Helio G200
39
out 100
VS
n/a
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Dimensity 920, vs MediaTek Helio G200. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 169830 | 136988 |
| GPU | 113631 | 77982 |
| Memory | 111717 | 118244 |
| UX | 152861 | 111612 |
| NanoReview Score | 548039 | 444826 |
| Stability | 99 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 13 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 116.7 MB/s | n/a |
| HTML5 Browser | 60.1 pages/s | n/a |
| PDF Rendering | 85.8 MP/sec | n/a |
| Background Blur | 6.59 frames/s | n/a |
| Photo Processing | 14.9 frames/s | n/a |
| Image Detection | 45.8 frames/s | n/a |
| HDR | 73.5 MP/sec | n/a |
| Ray Tracing | 3.29 MP/sec | n/a |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
64 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
59 FPS (High) | n/a |
 Fortnite |
27 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Shadowgun Legends |
68 FPS (Medium) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
59 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
53 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
46 FPS (Medium) | n/a |
| Device | Oppo Realme 9 Pro Plus (1080x2400) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2500 | 2200 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L3 Cache | 2 MB | n/a |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistor count | 10 billion | n/a |
| Power (TDP) | 4 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP2 |
| Architecture | Valhall 2nd gen | Valhall 1st gen |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 32 |
| Total shader | 128 | 64 |
| FLOPS | 243.2 GFLOPS | 140.8 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 51.2 Gbit/s | 17.1 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 2.1 - UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.1 |
UFS 2.2 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x108 pixels | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 2770 MB/s | Up to 650 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 1250 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | August, 2021 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | MT6877T | n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider MediaTek Dimensity 920 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
