MediaTek Helio A22 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
20
out 100
VS
31
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio A22, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 32718 | 130125 |
| GPU | 13014 | 70365 |
| Memory | 42950 | 65296 |
| UX | 34349 | 93626 |
| NanoReview Score | 123031 | 360125 |
| Stability | n/a | 97 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 4 fps |
| File Compression | 77 MB/s | 85.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 39 pages/s | 45.2 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 43.4 MP/sec | 62.8 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 1.68 frames/s | 4.7 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 9.11 frames/s | 15.6 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 14.1 frames/s | 31.5 frames/s |
| HDR | 43.6 MP/sec | 48.9 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.16 MP/sec | 2.38 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 59 FPS (Medium) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 36 FPS (Ultra) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 27 FPS (Medium) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 35 FPS (Medium) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 59 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 30 FPS (Ultra) |
| Device | n/a | Xiaomi Mi9T (1080x2340) |
Processor
| Architecture | 4/2 (Cortex-A53) | - 2/2.2 (Kryo 470 Gold Cortex-A76) - 6/1.8 (Kryo 470 Silver Cortex-A55) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 4 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 | 2200 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 4 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | PowerVR GE8300 | Adreno 618 |
| Architecture | PowerVR Series8XE (Rogue) | Adreno 600 |
| GPU Frequency | 660 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 8 | 128 |
| Total shader | 16 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 20.8 GFLOPS | 358.4 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | NeuroPilot | Qualcomm Hexagon 688 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 13.9 Gbit/s | 14.9 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.0 |
| Max. resolution | 1600x720 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x21 pixels | 1x192 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | X15 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 15 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 MB/s | Up to 800 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS |
Other
| Announced | June, 2018 yr | April, 2019 yr |
| Class | Low end | Mid-range |
| Codename | MT6761V/WAB | SM7150-AA |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
