MediaTek Helio G100 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020

Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G100, vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs MediaTek Helio G100 and HiSilicon Kirin 8020
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
MediaTek Helio G100
429591
HiSilicon Kirin 8020
1326372
CPU130560430571
GPU71805551063
Memory111938212421
UX115288132317
NanoReview Score4295911326372
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
MediaTek Helio G100
733
HiSilicon Kirin 8020
1350
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
MediaTek Helio G100
2028
HiSilicon Kirin 8020
3570
File Compression99.6 MB/s155.7 MB/s
HTML5 Browser52.5 pages/s101.3 pages/s
PDF Rendering74.5 MP/sec117.6 MP/sec
Background Blur5.97 frames/s11.9 frames/s
Photo Processing20.3 frames/s34.7 frames/s
Image Detection39.2 frames/s60.2 frames/s
HDR61.5 MP/sec95.4 MP/sec
Ray Tracing2.88 MP/sec4.78 MP/sec

Processor

Architecture - 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
- 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
- 1x 2.285 GHz –
- 3x 2.05 GHz –
- 4x 1.3 GHz –
Process TSMC SMIC
Cores count 8 8
Frequency 2200 2285
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
Process tech. 6 nm 7 nm

Graphics

GPU specifications including architecture, frequency, compute units, and support for graphics APIs (Vulkan, OpenCL, DirectX).
GPU Model Mali-G57 MP2 Maleoon 920
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Maleoon
GPU Frequency 1000 MHz 840 MHz
Execution Units 2 4
Shader Units 32 256
Total shader 64 1024
FLOPS 128 GFLOPS 1720.3 GFLOPS
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenCL 2.0 2.0
DirectX 12 12

AI Acceleration

Specifications of the neural processor (NPU / DSP) responsible for machine learning and AI acceleration tasks.
Artificial Intelligence Yes Da Vinci

Memory

RAM
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 2x16 bit 4x16 bit
Bandwidth 17.1 Gbit/s 68.2 Gbit/s
Max RAM 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia

GPU, ISP capabilities, display and camera support, as well as audio and video codec compatibility.
Memory Type UFS 2.2 UFS 4.0
Max. resolution 2520x1080 pixels n/a
Camera 1x200 pixels n/a
Video recording 2K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS, 1K at 120FPS
Video quality 2K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G Support LTE Cat. 13 n/a
5G Support No Yes
Download speed Up to 650 MB/s n/a
Upload speed Up to 150 MB/s n/a
Wi-Fi version 5 7
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Navigation - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC

Other

Announced August, 2024 yr May, 2025 yr
Class Mid-range Mid-range

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider HiSilicon Kirin 8020 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
1 (100%)
Total Votes: 1

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below