MediaTek Helio G200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
n/a
out 100
VS
35
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G200, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 136988 | 146117 |
| GPU | 77982 | 83020 |
| Memory | 118244 | 97461 |
| UX | 111612 | 116630 |
| NanoReview Score | 444826 | 443228 |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 7 fps |
| File Compression | n/a | 106.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | n/a | 58.3 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | n/a | 79.4 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | n/a | 6.37 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | n/a | 20.9 frames/s |
| Image Detection | n/a | 43.4 frames/s |
| HDR | n/a | 68.1 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | n/a | 2.86 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 66 FPS (Low) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 60 FPS (Low) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 24 FPS (Low) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 67 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 57 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 42 FPS (Ultra) |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
n/a | 19 FPS (Low) |
| Device | n/a | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro (1080x2400) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 2/2.2 (Kryo 660 Gold Cortex-A78) - 6/1.8 (Kryo 660 Silver Cortex-A55) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2200 | 2200 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 6 nm |
| Power (TDP) | n/a | 4 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G57 MP2 | Adreno 619 |
| Architecture | Valhall 1st gen | Adreno 600 |
| GPU Frequency | 1100 MHz | 840 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 128 |
| Total shader | 64 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 140.8 GFLOPS | 430.1 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Hexagon 686 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 17.1 Gbit/s | 17 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 12 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 2.2 | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.2 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x108 pixels |
| Video recording | 2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS | 1K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | Snapdragon X51 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 13 | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 650 MB/s | Up to 2500 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 1500 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.2 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | May, 2025 yr | October, 2021 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | n/a | SM6375 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 4
