MediaTek Helio G36 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
22
out 100
VS
33
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G36, vs HiSilicon Kirin 810. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 50072 | 140236 |
| GPU | 12068 | 91518 |
| Memory | 45507 | 96235 |
| UX | 33547 | 103685 |
| NanoReview Score | 141194 | 431674 |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 8 fps |
| File Compression | n/a | 97.9 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | n/a | 48.9 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | n/a | 54.9 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | n/a | 5.8 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | n/a | 17.9 frames/s |
| Image Detection | n/a | 38.5 frames/s |
| HDR | n/a | 59.1 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | n/a | 2.95 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 30 FPS (High) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 41 FPS (Ultra) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 29 FPS (Medium) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 43 FPS (Ultra) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 59 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 60 FPS (Ultra) |
| Device | n/a | Huawei Honor 9X (1080x2340) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A53 - 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
- 2x 2.27 GHz – Cortex-A76 - 6x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | TSMC | n/a |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2200 | 2270 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | n/a | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | n/a | 1 MB |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 6.9 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 2.2 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G52 MP6 |
| Architecture | PowerVR Series8XE (Rogue) | Bifrost 2nd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | 820 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 6 |
| Shader Units | 8 | 24 |
| Total shader | 32 | 144 |
| FLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS | 157.4 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | No | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 13.9 Gbit/s | 34.1 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | eMMC 5.1 | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2400x1080 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | 1x50 pixels | 1x48 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 30FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 30FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 |
- H.264 - H.265 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 12 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 MB/s | Up to 600 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | February, 2023 yr | June, 2019 yr |
| Class | Low end | Mid-range |
| Codename | MT6765V/XAA, MT6765V/XBA | Hi6280 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider HiSilicon Kirin 810 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
