MediaTek Helio G36 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
22
out 100
VS
33
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G36, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 50072 | 141170 |
| GPU | 12068 | 72788 |
| Memory | 45507 | 74189 |
| UX | 33547 | 100912 |
| NanoReview Score | 141194 | 389059 |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 6 fps |
| File Compression | n/a | 92.6 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | n/a | 45.7 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | n/a | 63.4 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | n/a | 5.25 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | n/a | 17.1 frames/s |
| Image Detection | n/a | 35.5 frames/s |
| HDR | n/a | 56.7 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | n/a | 2.54 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 43 FPS (High) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 40 FPS (Ultra) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 28 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 51 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 30 FPS (High) |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
n/a | 34 FPS (Medium) |
| Device | n/a | Realme 7 Pro (1080x2400) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A53 - 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
- 2x 2.3 GHz – Kryo 465 Gold (Cortex-A76) - 6x 1.8 GHz – Kryo 465 Silver (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2200 | 2300 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 2.2 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 618 |
| Architecture | PowerVR Series8XE (Rogue) | Adreno 600 |
| GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 8 | 128 |
| Total shader | 32 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS | 384 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | No | Hexagon 692 |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 5 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 13.9 Gbit/s | 14.9 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2400x1080 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x50 pixels | 1x192 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
384 kHz/32 bit |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | X15 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 15 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 MB/s | Up to 800 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | February, 2023 yr | January, 2020 yr |
| Class | Low end | Mid-range |
| Codename | MT6765V/XAA, MT6765V/XBA | SM7125 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
