MediaTek Helio G36 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4)
22
out 100
VS
98
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G36, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4). Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 50072 | 602481 |
| GPU | 12068 | 1165880 |
| Memory | 45507 | 534209 |
| UX | 33547 | 442171 |
| NanoReview Score | 141194 | 2744741 |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 143 fps |
| File Compression | n/a | 382.4 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | n/a | 229.7 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | n/a | 259.3 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | n/a | 33.5 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | n/a | 90.1 frames/s |
| Image Detection | n/a | 239.8 frames/s |
| HDR | n/a | 324 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | n/a | 12.8 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 120 FPS (Ultra) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 120 FPS (Ultra) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 60 FPS (Ultra) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 120 FPS (Ultra) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 120 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 120 FPS (Ultra) |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
n/a | 60 FPS (Ultra) |
| Device | n/a | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A53 - 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
- 2x 4.32 GHz – Oryon (Phoenix L) - 6x 3.53 GHz – Oryon (Phoenix M) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2200 | 4320 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9.2-A |
| L2 cache | n/a | 24 MB |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 8 MB |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 3 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 2.2 W | 8.2 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | PowerVR GE8320 | Adreno 830 |
| Architecture | PowerVR Series8XE (Rogue) | Adreno 800 |
| GPU Frequency | 680 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 3 |
| Shader Units | 8 | 512 |
| Total shader | 32 | 1536 |
| FLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS | 3379.2 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | No | Hexagon |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 1600 MHz | 5333 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
| Bandwidth | 13.9 Gbit/s | 85.4 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | eMMC 5.1 | - UFS 4.0 - UFS 4.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2400x1080 pixels | 3840x2540 pixels |
| Camera | 1x50 pixels | 1x320 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 30FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 30FPS | 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 |
- H.264 - H.265 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | Snapdragon X80 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 300 MB/s | Up to 10000 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 3500 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 6.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou |
Other
| Announced | February, 2023 yr | October, 2024 yr |
| Class | Low end | Flagship |
| Codename | MT6765V/XAA, MT6765V/XBA | SM8750-AB |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 2
