MediaTek Helio G36 vs Samsung Exynos 1280

Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G36, vs Samsung Exynos 1280. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs MediaTek Helio G36 and Samsung Exynos 1280
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
MediaTek Helio G36
141194
Samsung Exynos 1280
478526
CPU50072154535
GPU12068105189
Memory4550792022
UX33547126780
NanoReview Score141194478526
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
MediaTek Helio G36
n/a
Samsung Exynos 1280
2287
Stabilityn/a99 %
Graphics Testn/a13 fps
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
MediaTek Helio G36
229
Samsung Exynos 1280
851
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
MediaTek Helio G36
842
Samsung Exynos 1280
1913
File Compressionn/a97.2 MB/s
HTML5 Browsern/a50.8 pages/s
PDF Renderingn/a70.9 MP/sec
Background Blurn/a5.92 frames/s
Photo Processingn/a18.1 frames/s
Image Detectionn/a36 frames/s
HDRn/a70.2 MP/sec
Ray Tracingn/a3.04 MP/sec

Processor

Architecture - 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A53
- 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53
- 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
- 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
Process TSMC Samsung
Cores count 8 8
Frequency 2200 2400
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process tech. 12 nm 5 nm
Power (TDP) 2.2 W 6 W

Graphics

GPU specifications including architecture, frequency, compute units, and support for graphics APIs (Vulkan, OpenCL, DirectX).
GPU Model PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G68 MP4
Architecture PowerVR Series8XE (Rogue) Valhall 2nd gen
GPU Frequency 680 MHz 897 MHz
Execution Units 4 4
Shader Units 8 32
Total shader 32 128
FLOPS 43.5 GFLOPS 229.6 GFLOPS
Vulkan 1.1 1.3
OpenCL 1.2 2.0

AI Acceleration

Specifications of the neural processor (NPU / DSP) responsible for machine learning and AI acceleration tasks.
Artificial Intelligence No Yes
GPU Frequency n/a 4.3 TOPS

Memory

RAM
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory Frequency 1600 MHz 2133 MHz
Bus 2x16 bit 2x16 bit
Bandwidth 13.9 Gbit/s 17 Gbit/s
Max RAM 8 GB 8 GB

Multimedia

GPU, ISP capabilities, display and camera support, as well as audio and video codec compatibility.
Memory Type eMMC 5.1 UFS 2.2
Max. resolution 2400x1080 pixels 2960x1440 pixels
Camera 1x50 pixels 1x108 pixels
Video recording 1K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video quality 1080p at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G Support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 18
5G Support No Yes
Download speed Up to 300 MB/s Up to 2550 MB/s
Upload speed Up to 150 MB/s Up to 1280 MB/s
Wi-Fi version 5 5
Bluetooth version 5.0 5.2
Navigation - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo

Other

Announced February, 2023 yr March, 2022 yr
Class Low end Mid-range
Codename MT6765V/XAA, MT6765V/XBA S5E8825

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 1280 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below