MediaTek Helio G81 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000

Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G81, vs HiSilicon Kirin 8000. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs MediaTek Helio G81 and HiSilicon Kirin 8000
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
MediaTek Helio G81
258706
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
574704
CPU77856178879
GPU35328118109
Memory64438128205
UX81084149511
NanoReview Score258706574704
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
MediaTek Helio G81
420
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
999
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
MediaTek Helio G81
1391
HiSilicon Kirin 8000
2948
File Compressionn/a137.2 MB/s
HTML5 Browsern/a70.9 pages/s
PDF Renderingn/a108.9 MP/sec
Background Blurn/a10.3 frames/s
Photo Processingn/a26.3 frames/s
Image Detectionn/a55.8 frames/s
HDRn/a91.7 MP/sec
Ray Tracingn/a4.05 MP/sec

Processor

Architecture - 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75
- 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
- 1x 2.4 GHz – 1xA77 H
- 3x 2.19 GHz – 1xA77 L
- 4x 1.84 GHz – A55
Process TSMC SMIC
Cores count 8 8
Frequency 2000 2400
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Process tech. 12 nm 7 nm
Power (TDP) 5 W n/a

Graphics

GPU specifications including architecture, frequency, compute units, and support for graphics APIs (Vulkan, OpenCL, DirectX).
GPU Model Mali-G52 MP2 Mali-G610 MP4
Architecture Bifrost 2nd gen Valhall 3rd gen
GPU Frequency 1000 MHz 864 MHz
Execution Units 2 4
Shader Units 24 64
Total shader 48 256
FLOPS 96 GFLOPS 442.3 GFLOPS
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenCL 2.0 2.0

AI Acceleration

Specifications of the neural processor (NPU / DSP) responsible for machine learning and AI acceleration tasks.
Artificial Intelligence Yes Yes

Memory

RAM
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory Frequency 1800 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x16 bit 4x16 bit
Bandwidth 13.41 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
Max RAM 8 GB 12 GB

Multimedia

GPU, ISP capabilities, display and camera support, as well as audio and video codec compatibility.
Memory Type - eMMC 5.1
- UFS 2.1
- UFS 2.2
- UFS 3.1
Max. resolution 2520x1080 pixels n/a
Camera 1x48 pixels n/a
Video recording 2K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS
Video quality 2K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP9
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem n/a Balong
5G Support No Yes
Wi-Fi version 5 6
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.2
Navigation - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC

Other

Announced August, 2024 yr October, 2024 yr
Class Low end Mid-range
Codename MT6769J n/a

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider HiSilicon Kirin 8000 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below