MediaTek Helio G81 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
26
out 100
VS
52
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G81, vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 77856 | 256612 |
| GPU | 35328 | 242461 |
| Memory | 64438 | 174728 |
| UX | 81084 | 181730 |
| NanoReview Score | 258706 | 855531 |
| Stability | n/a | 99 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 35 fps |
| File Compression | n/a | 165.4 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | n/a | 110.2 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | n/a | 139.8 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | n/a | 10.3 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | n/a | 30 frames/s |
| Image Detection | n/a | 79.5 frames/s |
| HDR | n/a | 116.3 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | n/a | 4.71 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 77 FPS (Ultra) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 60 FPS (Ultra) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 26 FPS (High) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 74 FPS (Ultra) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 98 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 59 FPS (Ultra) |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
n/a | 57 FPS (Ultra) |
| Device | n/a | OnePlus Ace (1080x2412) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 - 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 | 2850 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 4 MB |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G610 MP6 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2nd gen | Valhall 3rd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 860 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 6 |
| Shader Units | 24 | 64 |
| Total shader | 48 | 384 |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 660.5 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | MediaTek APU 580 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 13.41 Gbit/s | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 2960x1440 pixels |
| Camera | 1x48 pixels | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 2K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 2K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | MediaTek UltraSave 2.0 |
| 4G Support | n/a | LTE Cat. 21 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | n/a | Up to 4700 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 2500 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | August, 2024 yr | March, 2022 yr |
| Class | Low end | Flagship |
| Codename | MT6769J | MT6895Z/TCZA |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider MediaTek Dimensity 8100 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
