MediaTek Helio G81 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
26
out 100
VS
48
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G81, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 77856 | 258336 |
| GPU | 35328 | 183669 |
| Memory | 64438 | 138904 |
| UX | 81084 | 176993 |
| NanoReview Score | 258706 | 757902 |
| File Compression | n/a | 154.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | n/a | 81.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | n/a | 109.9 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | n/a | 11.7 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | n/a | 25 frames/s |
| Image Detection | n/a | 55.8 frames/s |
| HDR | n/a | 93 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | n/a | 4.14 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 - 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 1x 2.3 GHz – Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720) - 3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720) - 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 | 2300 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G52 MP2 | Adreno 810 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2nd gen | Adreno 800 |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 895 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 24 | 128 |
| Total shader | 48 | 256 |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 458.2 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 13.41 Gbit/s | 25.6 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
- UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 3360x1600 pixels |
| Camera | 1x48 pixels | 1x200 pixels |
| Video recording | 2K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 2K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | Qualcomm X62 5G |
| 4G Support | n/a | LTE Cat. 18 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | n/a | Up to 2900 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 1600 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | August, 2024 yr | February, 2025 yr |
| Class | Low end | Mid-range |
| Codename | MT6769J | SM6650 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
