MediaTek Helio G81 vs Samsung Exynos 990
26
out 100
VS
43
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G81, vs Samsung Exynos 990. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 77856 | 201538 |
| GPU | 35328 | 231438 |
| Memory | 64438 | 138841 |
| UX | 81084 | 155432 |
| NanoReview Score | 258706 | 727249 |
| Stability | n/a | 60 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 22 fps |
| File Compression | n/a | 126.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | n/a | 68.4 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | n/a | 90.2 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | n/a | 9.95 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | n/a | 21 frames/s |
| Image Detection | n/a | 60.6 frames/s |
| HDR | n/a | 88.9 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | n/a | 3.37 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 - 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M5 - 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 - 4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 | 2730 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | n/a | 192 KB |
| L2 cache | n/a | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 2 MB |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | 9 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G77 MP11 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2nd gen | Valhall 1st gen |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 832 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 11 |
| Shader Units | 24 | 32 |
| Total shader | 48 | 352 |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 585.7 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Yes |
| GPU Frequency | n/a | 15 TOPS |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2750 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 13.41 Gbit/s | 44 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
- UFS 2.1 - UFS 3.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 3840x2400 pixels |
| Camera | 1x48 pixels | 1x108 pixels |
| Video recording | 2K at 30FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 2K at 30FPS | 8K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | Exynos 5123 |
| 4G Support | n/a | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | n/a | Up to 7350 MB/s |
| Upload speed | n/a | Up to 3670 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | August, 2024 yr | October, 2019 yr |
| Class | Low end | Flagship |
| Codename | MT6769J | S5E9830 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 990 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
