MediaTek Helio G85 vs MediaTek Helio G80
25
out 100
VS
25
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G85, vs MediaTek Helio G80. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 75141 | 82153 |
| GPU | 41989 | 47308 |
| Memory | 67477 | 53783 |
| UX | 78642 | 64707 |
| NanoReview Score | 263249 | 247951 |
| Stability | n/a | 96 % |
| Graphics Test | 4 fps | 4 fps |
| File Compression | 75.3 MB/s | 75.4 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 38.2 pages/s | 39.2 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 44.5 MP/sec | 51.6 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 3.05 frames/s | 3.19 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 12.2 frames/s | 13 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 23.5 frames/s | 24.7 frames/s |
| HDR | 43.3 MP/sec | 43.9 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 1.75 MP/sec | 1.85 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
45 FPS (High) | 30 FPS (High) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
40 FPS (Medium) | 30 FPS (Low) |
 Fortnite |
21 FPS (Low) | 27 FPS (Low) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
49 FPS (Low) | 52 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
51 FPS (Medium) | 53 FPS (Medium) |
 Genshin Impact |
46 FPS (Ultra) | 54 FPS (High) |
| Device | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (1080x2340) | Realme 6i (720x1600) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 - 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 - 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 | 2000 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L2 cache | n/a | 320 MB |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 1 MB |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 5.5 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2nd gen | Bifrost 2nd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 24 | 24 |
| Total shader | 48 | 48 |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 91.2 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 13.41 Gbit/s | 13.41 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
- eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x48 pixels | 1x48 pixels |
| Video recording | 2K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 2K at 30FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 MB/s | Up to 300 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 100 MB/s | Up to 100 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | April, 2020 yr | February, 2020 yr |
| Class | Low end | Low end |
| Codename | MT6769Z | MT6769T |
Results
No clear favorite identified yet; updates may follow as new data arrives.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
