MediaTek Helio G91 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
26
out 100
VS
39
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G91, vs Samsung Exynos 9820. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 88936 | 170665 |
| GPU | 37692 | 197730 |
| Memory | 68557 | 127795 |
| UX | 81443 | 128053 |
| NanoReview Score | 276628 | 624243 |
| Stability | n/a | 82 % |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 19 fps |
| File Compression | n/a | 100.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | n/a | 67.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | n/a | 68.2 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | n/a | 6.22 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | n/a | 21.2 frames/s |
| Image Detection | n/a | 46.2 frames/s |
| HDR | n/a | 78.3 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | n/a | 3.01 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 - 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 2/2.73 (Mongoose M4) - 2/2.31 (Cortex-A75) - 4/1.95 (Cortex-A55) |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2000 | 2730 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L2 cache | n/a | 2 MB |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 8.5 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G52 MP2 | Mali-G76 MP12 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 2nd gen | Bifrost 3rd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 702 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 12 |
| Shader Units | 24 | 24 |
| Total shader | 48 | 288 |
| FLOPS | 96 GFLOPS | 404.4 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek APU | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 1800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 13.41 Gbit/s | 34.1 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 12 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
- UFS 2.1 - UFS 3.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 3840x2400 pixels |
| Camera | 1x108 pixels | 1x32 pixels |
| Video recording | 2K at 30FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS |
| Video quality | 2K at 30FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 150FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | Exynos 5100 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 20 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 300 MB/s | Up to 2000 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 100 MB/s | Up to 316 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | June, 2024 yr | November, 2018 yr |
| Class | Low end | Flagship |
| Codename | n/a | S5E9820 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 9820 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
