MediaTek Helio G95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
31
out 100
VS
14
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G95, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 128148 | 50681 |
| GPU | 104779 | 7200 |
| Memory | 86490 | 35968 |
| UX | 90008 | 41040 |
| NanoReview Score | 409425 | 134889 |
| Stability | 98 % | n/a |
| Graphics Test | 8 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 93.5 MB/s | 60.7 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 46 pages/s | 24.4 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 58.3 MP/sec | 38.1 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 4.91 frames/s | 1 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 14.5 frames/s | 7.19 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 34.5 frames/s | 8.57 frames/s |
| HDR | 55.2 MP/sec | 26.6 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.47 MP/sec | 1.74 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
51 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
38 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Fortnite |
27 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Shadowgun Legends |
57 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
48 FPS (High) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
52 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
27 FPS (Low) | n/a |
| Device | Realme 7 (1080x2400) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
8x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Process | TSMC | Samsung |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2050 | 1400 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 1 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G76 MP4 | Adreno 505 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 3rd gen | Adreno 500 |
| GPU Frequency | 900 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 1 |
| Shader Units | 24 | 48 |
| Total shader | 96 | 48 |
| FLOPS | 172.8 GFLOPS | 43.2 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.0 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 11 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek APU | Hexagon 536 |
| GPU Frequency | 1 TOPS | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 1x32 bit |
| Bandwidth | 17.1 Gbit/s | n/a |
| Max RAM | 10 GB | 4 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
eMMC 5.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 1920x1200 pixels |
| Camera | 1x64 pixels | 1x21 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 30FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 30FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | X6 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 12 | LTE Cat. 4 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 600 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 75 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 4.1 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS |
Other
| Announced | September, 2020 yr | September, 2015 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Low end |
| Codename | MT6785V/CD | MSM8937 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider MediaTek Helio G95 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
