MediaTek Helio G95 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus
31
out 100
VS
43
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G95, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 128148 | 193505 |
| GPU | 104779 | 155728 |
| Memory | 86490 | 133411 |
| UX | 90008 | 135489 |
| NanoReview Score | 409425 | 618133 |
| Stability | 98 % | 97 % |
| Graphics Test | 8 fps | 14 fps |
| File Compression | 93.5 MB/s | 130.6 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 46 pages/s | 71.1 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 58.3 MP/sec | 92.4 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 4.91 frames/s | 9.03 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 14.5 frames/s | 31.2 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 34.5 frames/s | 62.4 frames/s |
| HDR | 55.2 MP/sec | 85.4 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.47 MP/sec | 3.8 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
51 FPS (Low) | 39 FPS (Ultra) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
38 FPS (Ultra) | 58 FPS (Ultra) |
 Fortnite |
27 FPS (Low) | 29 FPS (Medium) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
57 FPS (Low) | 53 FPS (Ultra) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
48 FPS (High) | 60 FPS (Ultra) |
 Genshin Impact |
52 FPS (Ultra) | 58 FPS (Ultra) |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
27 FPS (Low) | 39 FPS (Ultra) |
| Device | Realme 7 (1080x2400) | Realme X3 Superzoom (1080x2400) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 1/2.96 (Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold) - 3/2.42 (Cortex-A76 Kryo 485 Gold) - 4/1.8 (Cortex-A55 Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2050 | 2960 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | n/a | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | n/a | 1 MB |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 2 MB |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Transistor count | n/a | 6.7 billion |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G76 MP4 | Adreno 640 |
| Architecture | Bifrost 3rd gen | Adreno 600 |
| GPU Frequency | 900 MHz | 675 MHz |
| Execution Units | 4 | 3 |
| Shader Units | 24 | 256 |
| Total shader | 96 | 768 |
| FLOPS | 172.8 GFLOPS | 1036.8 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | n/a | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek APU | Hexagon 690 |
| GPU Frequency | 1 TOPS | n/a |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 17.1 Gbit/s | 34.13 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 10 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
UFS 3.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 3840x2160 pixels |
| Camera | 1x64 pixels | 1x192 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 30FPS | 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | X24 LTE, X50 5G |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 12 | LTE Cat. 20 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 600 MB/s | Up to 5000 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 1240 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS |
Other
| Announced | September, 2020 yr | July, 2019 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Flagship |
| Codename | MT6785V/CD | SM8150-AC |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
