MediaTek Helio G96 vs Google Tensor G4

Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G96, vs Google Tensor G4. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs MediaTek Helio G96 and Google Tensor G4
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
MediaTek Helio G96
381469
Google Tensor G4
1257329
CPU123372346368
GPU70302457862
Memory89831219407
UX97964233692
NanoReview Score3814691257329
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
MediaTek Helio G96
1154
Google Tensor G4
n/a
Graphics Test6 fpsn/a
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
MediaTek Helio G96
645
Google Tensor G4
2005
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
MediaTek Helio G96
1855
Google Tensor G4
4835
File Compression89.3 MB/s191.8 MB/s
HTML5 Browser47.7 pages/s148.7 pages/s
PDF Rendering69.6 MP/sec158.3 MP/sec
Background Blur5.29 frames/s15.6 frames/s
Photo Processing19.1 frames/s46 frames/s
Image Detection35.2 frames/s123.4 frames/s
HDR56.8 MP/sec134.5 MP/sec
Ray Tracing2.76 MP/sec4.8 MP/sec

Games

Graphics in popular 3D games
PUBGPUBG Mobile 72 FPS (Low) n/a
CODCall of Duty: Mobile 42 FPS (Medium) n/a
FortniteFortnite 26 FPS (Low) n/a
Shadow LegendsShadowgun Legends 58 FPS (Low) n/a
World of Tanks BlitzWorld of Tanks Blitz 66 FPS (Medium) n/a
Mobile Legends: Bang BangGenshin Impact 51 FPS (Ultra) n/a
Genshin ImpactMobile Legends: Bang Bang 23 FPS (Low) n/a
Device Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro (1080x2400) n/a

Processor

Architecture - 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
- 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
- 1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-X4
- 3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
- 4x 1.92 GHz – Cortex-A520
Process TSMC Samsung
Cores count 8 8
Frequency 2050 3100
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
Process tech. 12 nm 4 nm
Power (TDP) 5 W n/a

Graphics

GPU specifications including architecture, frequency, compute units, and support for graphics APIs (Vulkan, OpenCL, DirectX).
GPU Model Mali-G57 MP2 Mali-G715 MP7
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Valhall 4th gen
GPU Frequency 950 MHz 940 MHz
Execution Units 2 7
Shader Units 32 128
Total shader 64 896
FLOPS 121.6 GFLOPS 1684.4 GFLOPS
Vulkan 1.3 1.3
OpenCL 2.0 2.0
DirectX 12 n/a

AI Acceleration

Specifications of the neural processor (NPU / DSP) responsible for machine learning and AI acceleration tasks.
Artificial Intelligence MediaTek APU Yes

Memory

RAM
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 4266 MHz
Bus 2x16 bit 4x16 bit
Bandwidth 17.1 Gbit/s 68.2 Gbit/s
Max RAM 10 GB 16 GB

Multimedia

GPU, ISP capabilities, display and camera support, as well as audio and video codec compatibility.
Memory Type - eMMC 5.1
- UFS 2.2
- UFS 3.1
- UFS 4.0
Max. resolution 2520x1080 pixels 3840x2400 pixels
Camera 1x108 pixels n/a
Video recording 2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video quality 2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem n/a Exynos 5400c
4G Support LTE Cat. 13 n/a
5G Support No Yes
Download speed Up to 650 MB/s n/a
Upload speed Up to 150 MB/s n/a
Wi-Fi version 5 7
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.3
Navigation - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS

Other

Announced June, 2021 yr August, 2024 yr
Class Mid-range Flagship
Codename MT6781 GS401 (S5P9875)

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Google Tensor G4 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below