MediaTek Helio G96 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350
30
out 100
VS
70
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G96, vs MediaTek Dimensity 8350. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 123372 | 324360 |
| GPU | 70302 | 484687 |
| Memory | 89831 | 265076 |
| UX | 97964 | 279011 |
| NanoReview Score | 381469 | 1353134 |
| Graphics Test | 6 fps | n/a |
| File Compression | 89.3 MB/s | 181.9 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 47.7 pages/s | 136.6 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 69.6 MP/sec | 163 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 5.29 frames/s | 13 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 19.1 frames/s | 35.2 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 35.2 frames/s | 98.3 frames/s |
| HDR | 56.8 MP/sec | 133.4 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.76 MP/sec | 4.81 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
72 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
42 FPS (Medium) | n/a |
 Fortnite |
26 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Shadowgun Legends |
58 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
66 FPS (Medium) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
51 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
23 FPS (Low) | n/a |
| Device | Xiaomi Poco M4 Pro (1080x2400) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715 - 3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715 - 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510 |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2050 | 3350 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 4 MB |
| Process tech. | 12 nm | 4 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G615 MP6 |
| Architecture | Valhall 1st gen | Valhall 4rd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 950 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 6 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 128 |
| Total shader | 64 | 768 |
| FLOPS | 121.6 GFLOPS | 2150.4 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | MediaTek APU | MediaTek APU 780 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 17.1 Gbit/s | 68.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 10 GB | 24 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.2 |
UFS 4.0 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 2960x1440 pixels |
| Camera | 1x108 pixels | 1x320 pixels |
| Video recording | 2K at 30FPS, 1K at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 2K at 30FPS, 1080p at 60FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
Connectivity
| Modem | n/a | MediaTek T800 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 13 | LTE Cat. 24 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 650 MB/s | Up to 5170 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | n/a |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | June, 2021 yr | November, 2024 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | MT6781 | MT6897 MT6897Z_A/ZA MT8792Z/NA |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider MediaTek Dimensity 8350 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
