MediaTek Helio G99 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
33
out 100
VS
54
out 100
Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G99, vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 131367 | 267830 |
| GPU | 71737 | 237310 |
| Memory | 100728 | 198476 |
| UX | 118629 | 230157 |
| NanoReview Score | 422461 | 933773 |
| Stability | n/a | 95 % |
| Graphics Test | 7 fps | 35 fps |
| File Compression | 99.7 MB/s | 172.8 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 50.6 pages/s | 108 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 70.6 MP/sec | 140.4 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 6.15 frames/s | 14.7 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 18.8 frames/s | 34.4 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 40.1 frames/s | 86.2 frames/s |
| HDR | 54.6 MP/sec | 118.4 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.79 MP/sec | 4.63 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
86 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
37 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Shadowgun Legends |
91 FPS (Low) | n/a |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
66 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Genshin Impact |
55 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
48 FPS (Ultra) | n/a |
| Device | Cubot X70 (1080x2408) | n/a |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76) - 6/2 (Cortex-A55) |
- 1/3.1 (Cortex A78) - 3/3 (Cortex A78) - 4/2 (Cortex A55) |
| Process | TSMC | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2200 | 3100 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L3 Cache | n/a | 4 MB |
| Process tech. | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | 6 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G610 MP6 |
| Architecture | Valhall 1st gen | Valhall 3rd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 1000 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 6 |
| Shader Units | 32 | 64 |
| Total shader | 64 | 384 |
| FLOPS | 128 GFLOPS | 729.6 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | MediaTek APU 580 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory Frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 17.1 Gbit/s | 51.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 12 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 2960x1440 pixels |
| Camera | 1x108 pixels | 1x320 pixels |
| Video recording | 2K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 2K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - AV1 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC LC - FLAC - HE-AACv1 - HE-AACv2 - MP3 |
Connectivity
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 13 | LTE Cat. 21 |
| 5G Support | No | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 650 MB/s | Up to 4700 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 150 MB/s | Up to 2500 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 6 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.3 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | May, 2022 yr | December, 2022 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | MT6789 | MT6896Z |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider MediaTek Dimensity 8200 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 2
