MediaTek Helio G99 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio G99, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs MediaTek Helio G99 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
MediaTek Helio G99
422461
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
635680
CPU131367212957
GPU71737154666
Memory100728137272
UX118629130785
NanoReview Score422461635680
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
MediaTek Helio G99
1243
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2635
Stabilityn/a98 %
Graphics Test7 fps15 fps
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
MediaTek Helio G99
729
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
1064
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
MediaTek Helio G99
1979
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
3006
File Compression99.7 MB/s159.1 MB/s
HTML5 Browser50.6 pages/s74.5 pages/s
PDF Rendering70.6 MP/sec118.7 MP/sec
Background Blur6.15 frames/s11.2 frames/s
Photo Processing18.8 frames/s26.5 frames/s
Image Detection40.1 frames/s58.4 frames/s
HDR54.6 MP/sec95.4 MP/sec
Ray Tracing2.79 MP/sec4.28 MP/sec

Games

Graphics in popular 3D games
PUBGPUBG Mobile 86 FPS (Low) n/a
CODCall of Duty: Mobile 37 FPS (Ultra) n/a
Shadow LegendsShadowgun Legends 91 FPS (Low) n/a
World of Tanks BlitzWorld of Tanks Blitz 66 FPS (Ultra) n/a
Mobile Legends: Bang BangGenshin Impact 55 FPS (Ultra) n/a
Genshin ImpactMobile Legends: Bang Bang 48 FPS (Ultra) n/a
Device Cubot X70 (1080x2408) n/a

Processor

Architecture - 2/2.2 (Cortex-A76)
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
- 1/2.5 (Kryo 670 Prime Cortex-A78)
- 3/2.4 (Kryo 670 Gold Cortex-A78)
- 4/1.8 (Kryo 670 Silver Cortex-A55)
Process TSMC TSMC
Cores count 8 8
Frequency 2200 2500
Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.4-A
L2 cache n/a 2 MB
Process tech. 6 nm 6 nm
Power (TDP) 5 W 5 W

Graphics

GPU specifications including architecture, frequency, compute units, and support for graphics APIs (Vulkan, OpenCL, DirectX).
GPU Model Mali-G57 MP2 Adreno 642
Architecture Valhall 1st gen Adreno 600
GPU Frequency 1000 MHz 608 MHz
Execution Units 2 2
Shader Units 32 256
Total shader 64 512
FLOPS 128 GFLOPS 622.6 GFLOPS
Vulkan 1.3 1.1
OpenCL 2.0 2.0
DirectX 12 12.1

AI Acceleration

Specifications of the neural processor (NPU / DSP) responsible for machine learning and AI acceleration tasks.
Artificial Intelligence Yes Hexagon 770

Memory

RAM
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory Frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x16 bit 2x16 bit
Bandwidth 17.1 Gbit/s 25.6 Gbit/s
Max RAM 12 GB 16 GB

Multimedia

GPU, ISP capabilities, display and camera support, as well as audio and video codec compatibility.
Memory Type UFS 2.2 - UFS 2.2
- UFS 3.0
- UFS 3.1
Max. resolution 2520x1080 pixels 2520x1080 pixels
Camera 1x108 pixels 1x192 pixels
Video recording 2K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video quality 2K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
- VP9
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem n/a X53
4G Support LTE Cat. 13 LTE Cat. 24
5G Support No Yes
Download speed Up to 650 MB/s Up to 3700 MB/s
Upload speed Up to 150 MB/s Up to 1600 MB/s
Wi-Fi version 5 6
Bluetooth version 5.2 5.2
Navigation - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- SBAS
- NAVIC

Other

Announced May, 2022 yr October, 2021 yr
Class Mid-range Mid-range
Codename MT6789 SM7325-AE

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
2 (100%)
Total Votes: 2

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below