MediaTek Helio P35 vs Samsung Exynos 1330

Compared 2 processors: MediaTek Helio P35, vs Samsung Exynos 1330. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs MediaTek Helio P35 and Samsung Exynos 1330
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
MediaTek Helio P35
147723
Samsung Exynos 1330
438848
CPU55950161056
GPU1612463510
Memory3675789135
UX38892125147
NanoReview Score147723438848
3DMark Wild Life
3DMark Wild Life
MediaTek Helio P35
n/a
Samsung Exynos 1330
1385
Stabilityn/a99 %
Graphics Testn/a8 fps
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
MediaTek Helio P35
260
Samsung Exynos 1330
929
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
MediaTek Helio P35
812
Samsung Exynos 1330
2128
File Compressionn/a108 MB/s
HTML5 Browsern/a58.9 pages/s
PDF Renderingn/a81 MP/sec
Background Blurn/a5.89 frames/s
Photo Processingn/a21.4 frames/s
Image Detectionn/a40.6 frames/s
HDRn/a66.7 MP/sec
Ray Tracingn/a3.06 MP/sec

Processor

Architecture - 4/2.3 (Cortex-A53)
- 4/1.8 (Cortex-A53)
- 2/2.4 (Cortex-A78)
- 6/2 (Cortex-A55)
Process TSMC Samsung
Cores count 8 8
Frequency 2300 2400
Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
Process tech. 12 nm 5 nm
Power (TDP) 2.2 W 5 W

Graphics

GPU specifications including architecture, frequency, compute units, and support for graphics APIs (Vulkan, OpenCL, DirectX).
GPU Model PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G68 MP2
Architecture PowerVR Series8XE (Rogue) Valhall 2nd gen
GPU Frequency 680 MHz 949 MHz
Execution Units 4 2
Shader Units 8 32
Total shader 32 64
FLOPS 43.5 GFLOPS 121.5 GFLOPS
Vulkan 1.1 1.3
OpenCL 1.2 2.0

AI Acceleration

Specifications of the neural processor (NPU / DSP) responsible for machine learning and AI acceleration tasks.
Artificial Intelligence No Yes
GPU Frequency n/a 4.9 TOPS

Memory

RAM
Memory Type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
Memory Frequency 1600 MHz 3200 MHz
Bus 2x16 bit 4x16 bit
Bandwidth 14.9 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
Max RAM 6 GB 8 GB

Multimedia

GPU, ISP capabilities, display and camera support, as well as audio and video codec compatibility.
Memory Type eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.2
- UFS 3.1
Max. resolution 2400x1080 pixels 2960x1440 pixels
Camera 1x25 pixels 1x108 pixels
Video recording 1K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video quality 1080p at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- H.264
- H.265
- VP8
Audio codecs - AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

4G Support LTE Cat. 7 LTE Cat. 18
5G Support No Yes
Download speed Up to 300 MB/s Up to 2550 MB/s
Upload speed Up to 150 MB/s Up to 1280 MB/s
Wi-Fi version 5 5
Bluetooth version 5.0 5.2
Navigation - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo

Other

Announced December, 2018 yr February, 2023 yr
Class Low end Low end
Codename MT6765 S5E8535

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Samsung Exynos 1330 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below