Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 vs MediaTek Helio G85
36
out 100
VS
25
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, vs MediaTek Helio G85. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 161131 | 75141 |
| GPU | 47367 | 41989 |
| Memory | 116028 | 67477 |
| UX | 102543 | 78642 |
| NanoReview Score | 427069 | 263249 |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 4 fps |
| File Compression | 104.3 MB/s | 75.3 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 56.4 pages/s | 38.2 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 76.6 MP/sec | 44.5 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 6.25 frames/s | 3.05 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 18.5 frames/s | 12.2 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 43.1 frames/s | 23.5 frames/s |
| HDR | 68.7 MP/sec | 43.3 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 2.89 MP/sec | 1.75 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 45 FPS (High) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 40 FPS (Medium) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 21 FPS (Low) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 49 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 51 FPS (Medium) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 46 FPS (Ultra) |
| Device | n/a | Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 (1080x2340) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 - 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2200 | 2000 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 4 W | 5 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 613 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| Architecture | Adreno 600 | Bifrost 2nd gen |
| GPU Frequency | 955 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Execution Units | 1 | 2 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 24 |
| Total shader | 128 | 48 |
| FLOPS | 244.5 GFLOPS | 96 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Yes |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 25.6 Gbit/s | 13.41 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.1 |
- eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1200 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x108 pixels | 1x48 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 60FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Snapdragon X61 | n/a |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 22 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 2500 MB/s | Up to 300 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 900 MB/s | Up to 100 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo |
Other
| Announced | June, 2023 yr | April, 2020 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Low end |
| Codename | SM4450 | MT6769Z |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
