Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
12
out 100
VS
29
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 435, vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 42130 | 104065 |
| GPU | 11613 | 39362 |
| Memory | 38229 | 92127 |
| UX | 25406 | 72779 |
| NanoReview Score | 117378 | 308333 |
| Graphics Test | n/a | 3 fps |
| File Compression | 38.8 MB/s | 90 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 18.8 pages/s | 46.2 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 27.3 MP/sec | 64.4 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 0.92 frames/s | 3.06 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 4.66 frames/s | 11.7 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 6.86 frames/s | 16.3 frames/s |
| HDR | 18.3 MP/sec | 51.6 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 1.02 MP/sec | 2.52 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 59 FPS (Medium) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 60 FPS (Low) |
 Fortnite |
n/a | 23 FPS (Low) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 65 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 62 FPS (Medium) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 54 FPS (Ultra) |
 Mobile Legends: Bang Bang |
n/a | 26 FPS (Low) |
| Device | n/a | Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 (1080x2400) |
Processor
| Architecture | 8x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 | - 4/2.4 (Kryo 265 Gold Cortex-A73) - 4/1.9 (Kryo 265 Silver Cortex-A53) |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 1400 | 2400 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process tech. | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Transistor count | 1 billion | n/a |
| Power (TDP) | 4 W | n/a |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 505 | Adreno 610 |
| Architecture | Adreno 500 | Adreno 600 |
| GPU Frequency | 450 MHz | 1114 MHz |
| Execution Units | 1 | 1 |
| Shader Units | 48 | 128 |
| Total shader | 48 | 128 |
| FLOPS | 43.2 GFLOPS | 285.2 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 11 | 12.1 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon 536 | Hexagon 686 |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 800 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Bus | 1x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 6.4 Gbit/s | 17 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 4 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | eMMC 5.1 | - eMMC 5.1 - UFS 2.2 |
| Max. resolution | 1920x1200 pixels | 2520x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x21 pixels | 1x64 pixels |
| Video recording | 1K at 30FPS | 1K at 60FPS |
| Video quality | 1080p at 60FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP8 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP8 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | X9 | X11 |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 7 | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G Support | No | No |
| Download speed | Up to 300 MB/s | Up to 390 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 100 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - SBAS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | February, 2016 yr | October, 2021 yr |
| Class | Low end | Low end |
| Codename | MSM8940 | SM6225 |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 0
