Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 vs MediaTek Helio G35
43
out 100
VS
22
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3, vs MediaTek Helio G35. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 212110 | 52240 |
| GPU | 120714 | 19256 |
| Memory | 141171 | 40204 |
| UX | 152541 | 32687 |
| NanoReview Score | 626536 | 144387 |
| File Compression | 158.7 MB/s | 63.1 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 71.4 pages/s | 25.9 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 106.8 MP/sec | 36.1 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 9.48 frames/s | 0.87 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 27.8 frames/s | 7.57 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 57.3 frames/s | 10.5 frames/s |
| HDR | 92.6 MP/sec | 30 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.03 MP/sec | 1.65 MP/sec |
Games
 PUBG Mobile |
n/a | 23 FPS (Low) |
 Call of Duty: Mobile |
n/a | 29 FPS (Medium) |
 Shadowgun Legends |
n/a | 30 FPS (Low) |
 World of Tanks Blitz |
n/a | 43 FPS (Low) |
 Genshin Impact |
n/a | 29 FPS (Low) |
| Device | n/a | Xiaomi Poco C3 (720x1600) |
Processor
| Architecture | - 4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 - 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
- 4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A53 - 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Process | Samsung | TSMC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2400 | 2300 |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 12 nm |
| Power (TDP) | 5 W | 2.2 W |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 710 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| Architecture | Adreno 700 | PowerVR Series8XE (Rogue) |
| GPU Frequency | 940 MHz | 680 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 4 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 8 |
| Total shader | 256 | 32 |
| FLOPS | 481.3 GFLOPS | 43.5 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | n/a |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Hexagon | No |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 25.6 Gbit/s | 13.9 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 12 GB | 6 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.1 |
eMMC 5.1 |
| Max. resolution | 2520x1080 pixels | 2400x1080 pixels |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | 1x25 pixels |
| Video recording | 4K at 30FPS | 1K at 30FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 30FPS | 1080p at 30FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Snapdragon X62 | n/a |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 7 |
| 5G Support | Yes | No |
| Download speed | Up to 2900 MB/s | Up to 300 MB/s |
| Upload speed | Up to 1600 MB/s | Up to 150 MB/s |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 5 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS |
Other
| Announced | September, 2024 yr | June, 2020 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Low end |
| Codename | SM6475-AB | MT6765G |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 1
