Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 vs Apple A19 Pro

Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, vs Apple A19 Pro. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device

Review

Key Specs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 and Apple A19 Pro
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
NanoReview Score
Overall score by NanoReview

Tests & specs

Specs & test comparison

Benchmarks

CPU performance comparison across tasks
AnTuTu 10
AnTuTu 10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
757902
Apple A19 Pro
2112459
CPU258336510033
GPU183669791934
Memory138904367847
UX176993442645
NanoReview Score7579022112459
GeekBench v6
Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
1091
Apple A19 Pro
3671
Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4
3085
Apple A19 Pro
10834
File Compression154.3 MB/sn/a
HTML5 Browser81.6 pages/sn/a
PDF Rendering109.9 MP/secn/a
Background Blur11.7 frames/sn/a
Photo Processing25 frames/sn/a
Image Detection55.8 frames/sn/a
HDR93 MP/secn/a
Ray Tracing4.14 MP/secn/a

Processor

Architecture - 1x 2.3 GHz – Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720)
- 3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720)
- 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520)
- 2x 4.38 GHz -
- 4x 2.51 GHz -
Process TSMC TSMC
Cores count 8 6
Frequency 2300 4380
Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9.2-A
Process tech. 4 nm 3 nm

Graphics

GPU specifications including architecture, frequency, compute units, and support for graphics APIs (Vulkan, OpenCL, DirectX).
GPU Model Adreno 810 n/a
Architecture Adreno 800 n/a
GPU Frequency 895 MHz n/a
Execution Units 2 n/a
Shader Units 128 n/a
Total shader 256 n/a
FLOPS 458.2 GFLOPS n/a
Vulkan 1.3 n/a
OpenCL 3.0 n/a
DirectX 12.1 n/a

AI Acceleration

Specifications of the neural processor (NPU / DSP) responsible for machine learning and AI acceleration tasks.
Artificial Intelligence Yes Neural Engine

Memory

RAM
Memory Type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
Memory Frequency 3200 MHz 4800 MHz
Bus 2x16 bit 4x16 bit
Bandwidth 25.6 Gbit/s n/a
Max RAM 16 GB 12 GB

Multimedia

GPU, ISP capabilities, display and camera support, as well as audio and video codec compatibility.
Memory Type - UFS 2.2
- UFS 3.1
NVMe
Max. resolution 3360x1600 pixels n/a
Camera 1x200 pixels 1x48 pixels
Video recording 4K at 30FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video quality 4K at 30FPS 4K at 120FPS
Video codecs - H.264
- H.265
- VP9
- H.264
- H.265
- AV1
- VP8
- VP9
- Motion JPEG
Audio codecs - AAC
- AIFF
- CAF
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV
- AAC
- AAX
- AAX+
- AC-3
- AIFF
- CAF
- E-AC-3
- MP3
- MP4
- WAV

Connectivity

Modem Qualcomm X62 5G n/a
4G Support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
5G Support Yes Yes
Download speed Up to 2900 MB/s n/a
Upload speed Up to 1600 MB/s n/a
Wi-Fi version 6 7
Bluetooth version 5.4 5.4
Navigation - GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC
- GPS
- GLONASS
- Beidou
- Galileo
- QZSS
- NAVIC

Other

Announced February, 2025 yr September, 2025 yr
Class Mid-range Flagship
Codename SM6650 n/a

Results

After analyzing the data, we consider Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 the clear winner in this comparison.

Survey

Which smartphone would you pick?
0 (0%)
0 (0%)
Total Votes: 0

User comments

Share your opinion or ask questions below