Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020
48
out 100
VS
67
out 100
Compared 2 processors: Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 4, vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020. Below are specs, tests, pros and cons for each device
Review
Processor Performance
Single-Core Benchmark Score
Gaming Performance
Graphics and OpenCL/Vulkan tests
Energy Efficiency
Chip Power Efficiency
Tests & specs
Specs & test comparisonBenchmarks
| CPU | 258336 | 430571 |
| GPU | 183669 | 551063 |
| Memory | 138904 | 212421 |
| UX | 176993 | 132317 |
| NanoReview Score | 757902 | 1326372 |
| File Compression | 154.3 MB/s | 155.7 MB/s |
| HTML5 Browser | 81.6 pages/s | 101.3 pages/s |
| PDF Rendering | 109.9 MP/sec | 117.6 MP/sec |
| Background Blur | 11.7 frames/s | 11.9 frames/s |
| Photo Processing | 25 frames/s | 34.7 frames/s |
| Image Detection | 55.8 frames/s | 60.2 frames/s |
| HDR | 93 MP/sec | 95.4 MP/sec |
| Ray Tracing | 4.14 MP/sec | 4.78 MP/sec |
Processor
| Architecture | - 1x 2.3 GHz – Kryo Prime (Cortex-A720) - 3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo Gold (Cortex-A720) - 4x 1.8 GHz – Kryo Silver (Cortex-A520) |
- 1x 2.285 GHz – - 3x 2.05 GHz – - 4x 1.3 GHz – |
| Process | TSMC | SMIC |
| Cores count | 8 | 8 |
| Frequency | 2300 | 2285 |
| Instruction set | ARMv9-A | ARMv8-A |
| Process tech. | 4 nm | 7 nm |
Graphics
| GPU Model | Adreno 810 | Maleoon 920 |
| Architecture | Adreno 800 | Maleoon |
| GPU Frequency | 895 MHz | 840 MHz |
| Execution Units | 2 | 4 |
| Shader Units | 128 | 256 |
| Total shader | 256 | 1024 |
| FLOPS | 458.2 GFLOPS | 1720.3 GFLOPS |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
AI Acceleration
| Artificial Intelligence | Yes | Da Vinci |
Memory
| Memory Type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5X |
| Memory Frequency | 3200 MHz | 4266 MHz |
| Bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 25.6 Gbit/s | 68.2 Gbit/s |
| Max RAM | 16 GB | 16 GB |
Multimedia
| Memory Type | - UFS 2.2 - UFS 3.1 |
UFS 4.0 |
| Max. resolution | 3360x1600 pixels | n/a |
| Camera | 1x200 pixels | n/a |
| Video recording | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS, 1K at 120FPS |
| Video quality | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 60FPS, 1080p at 120FPS |
| Video codecs | - H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
- H.264 - H.265 - VP9 |
| Audio codecs | - AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
- AAC - AIFF - CAF - MP3 - MP4 - WAV |
Connectivity
| Modem | Qualcomm X62 5G | n/a |
| 4G Support | LTE Cat. 18 | n/a |
| 5G Support | Yes | Yes |
| Download speed | Up to 2900 MB/s | n/a |
| Upload speed | Up to 1600 MB/s | n/a |
| Wi-Fi version | 6 | 7 |
| Bluetooth version | 5.4 | 5.4 |
| Navigation | - GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
- GPS - GLONASS - Beidou - Galileo - QZSS - NAVIC |
Other
| Announced | February, 2025 yr | May, 2025 yr |
| Class | Mid-range | Mid-range |
| Codename | SM6650 | n/a |
Results
After analyzing the data, we consider HiSilicon Kirin 8020 the clear winner in this comparison.
Survey
Total Votes: 3
